$12.3 million: Seminoles of Florida (see Racial Justice in America: A Reference Handbook by David B. Mustard, 2002, ABC-CLIO, p. 81). March 23, 2019 No Comments Back to Timeline Related Previous Post Next Post You may also like June 29, 2018 In February 1968, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. announces specific demands: $30 billion for antipoverty, full employment, guaranteed income, and the annual construction of 500,000 affordable residences. June 29, 2018 On October 15, 1994, the December I2th Movement International Secretariat (IS) and the International Association Against Torture (AICT, Spanish acronym) hold a tribunal, at the Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem. More than 80 testify. More than 150 presentations are prepared for Maurice Glele, Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance. June 29, 2018 On December 4, 1995, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decides Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 1995), rejecting reparations damages claim against the US on ground that US has not waived its sovereign immunity with respect to any of plaintiff’s theories of relief.
June 29, 2018 In February 1968, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. announces specific demands: $30 billion for antipoverty, full employment, guaranteed income, and the annual construction of 500,000 affordable residences.
June 29, 2018 On October 15, 1994, the December I2th Movement International Secretariat (IS) and the International Association Against Torture (AICT, Spanish acronym) hold a tribunal, at the Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem. More than 80 testify. More than 150 presentations are prepared for Maurice Glele, Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance.
June 29, 2018 On December 4, 1995, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decides Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 1995), rejecting reparations damages claim against the US on ground that US has not waived its sovereign immunity with respect to any of plaintiff’s theories of relief.
